Martlet – Ukraine’s Latest Surface to Air Missile

April 11, 2022

There was an interesting development in Ukraine over the weekend. Footage posted by the Ukrainian military showed them using a Man Portable Air Defence System, or MANPADS for short, to allegedly shoot down a Russian drone.


Nothing particularly unusual in that, but the missile system used is. The weapon appears to be a British-made Martlet system.

While Britain has already reportedly sent Starstreak missiles to Ukraine the Martlet is only just starting to enter service with UK forces. Indeed, the weapon in the video was initially thought to be a Starstreak before eagle-eyed watchers correctly identified it.

The Martlet was developed primarily for the Future Air-to-Surface Guided Weapon (Light) FASGW(L) requirement. This is intended to give British military a single high-accuracy precision weapon system for use against small, fast-moving targets on land, sea and air.


Officially designated as the Lightweight Multirole Missile (LMM), the system is currently integrated onto Royal Navy Wildcat helicopters for use against surface targets and some of the Royal Artillery’s Starstreak air defence units. This sees one of the triple launcher tubes replaced with a Martlet, given a launch station a total of two Starstreaks and one Martlet.

The LMM is also likely to soon be fielded on Royal Navy warships alongside close in weapon systems to provide a precision counter to small boats and UAVs that may be used against them in the future.

For guidance the Martlet uses an automatic target tracker (ATT). Once a target is identified, the missile operator sights the launcher and activates the ATT. This locks the target and the missile fired. The ATT then tracks both missile and target and guides the weapon into the hit.

Martlet also has a manual guidance mode, which allows the operator to interrupt the ATT at any stage of engagement and take control over.

Like Starstreak, this type of guidance is extremely difficult to counter, as opposed to the more usual heat-seeking guidance systems used on most MANPADS in service, which can be deflected with flares and other countermeasure.

In reality the Martlet is a more limited system than Starstreak. Range is stated to be over six kilometres, in comparison to the Starstreak’s eight, and speed is halved to Mach 1.5 in comparison to Mach 3 to the older missile.

Its warhead is also less effective. While Starstreak use a triple dart made from tungsten alloy to destroy a target, the Martlet uses a blast-fragmentation warhead.


While no doubt effective enough generally, this is apparently inferior to the Starstreak’s terminal effects, which are generally stated to be catastrophic to aerial targets.

So why have Martlet’s, a brand-new system that is barely in service, been sent to Ukraine when the more well-known Starstreak are already being shipped?

Well, to put not too fine a point on it, they are much cheaper.

Best public estimates I have seen say that Martlets cost about £1.5 million each; Starstreak’s are about £3 million.

And this engagement probably best shows how the Martlets are intended to be used – against recon drones. The war in Ukraine has reinforced an issue that has been worrying militaries for the last decade; how hard it is for conventional anti-aircraft systems to engage small UAVs that quite often have basically nonexistent thermal and radar signatures.

Martlet is capable of doing the job of neutralizing these sort of targets.

I am sure many will be tempted to criticize the use of an expensive missile to down a drone that, in all probability, costs only thousands, at most tens of thousands of dollars. But the truth is, the costs of allowing drones to operate unhindered, even if just in an observation role, is going to prove a decisive factor in this and in future conflicts.

So, while the initial cost may seem prohibitive, it will be far cheaper in the long run.


US Lend-Lease for Ukraine – Just What Further Weapons Can the West Send?

U.S. to Supply Switchblade “Kamikaze Drones” to Ukraine?

The Martin XB-48; Neither Simple nor Innovative Enough

The Martin XB-48; Neither Simple nor Innovative Enough

The impact that Glenn Martin had on aviation is difficult to overstate. On top of being one of the first record breaking pioneers, starting his career as a designer and builder just shortly after the Wright brothers first flew, Martin also had a great influence on...

The Siemens-Schuckert D.IV; Best Fighter of the First World War?

The Siemens-Schuckert D.IV; Best Fighter of the First World War?

When it comes to aircraft of great potential, those of the First World War are often overlooked. And while the dogfights between aircraft like the Sopwith Camel, the Fokker Dr.1 triplane and the SPAD XIII are often the source for historical recollection, this tends to...

The Twin 40mm Mustang; AM106

The Twin 40mm Mustang; AM106

It is well remembered that the legendary P-51 originated out of a…dare I say boast?...made by "Dutch" Kindelberger, President of North American Aviation. Asked by the British if they could build the Curtiss P-40 under licence for the Air Forces of the Commonwealth,...

King of the Rats; The Polikarpov I-185

King of the Rats; The Polikarpov I-185

The Polikarpov I-185 is one of the foremost of the “What-if” aircraft. Fast, agile and heavily armed, the I-185 easily had the potential to be the best fighter in the world when it first flew in early 1941, the ultimate evolution of the Polikarpov fighter line that...

The McDonnell Douglas F-15N Sea Eagle; Tomcat Rival

The McDonnell Douglas F-15N Sea Eagle; Tomcat Rival

The F-15 is a truly great aircraft. Built from the lessons of air combat over Vietnam, the Eagle was built to be the most capable air superiority aircraft possible at the time. The airframe’s sheer versatility has seen it undergoing continuous updating and...